![]() The MuseScore app itself is licensed GPLv3, which gives developers the right to fork its source and modify it. This time, the controversy isn't over Audacity-it's about MuseScore, an open source application that allows musicians to create, share, and download musical scores (especially, but not only, in the form of sheet music). On Twitter, Muse also re-tweeted an article that seeks to de-bunk the FOSS Post report.Further Reading No, open source Audacity audio editor is not “spyware”Muse Group-owner of the popular audio-editing app Audacity-is in hot water with the open source community again. Data will not be shared with third parties and only basic data will be collected, it says. Muse Group did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but it tells MusicRadar that the controversy is overblown and "due largely to unclear phrasing" of the updated privacy policy. This is clear from visiting the Audacity GitHub and Reddit pages, and there are now calls to fork the software in order to revert back to a policy of not collecting such data from users who simply want to edit audio using the free software. It's also stated that personal data is stored on servers in the European Economic Area (EEA), but that "we are occasionally required to share your personal data with our main office in Russia and our external counsel in the USA."Īs you'd expect, the collection of personal data, the potential for it to be shared with law enforcement, regulators, and government, as well as there being the option to transfer it to Russia, has angered a lot of people. The personal data collected can be shared with Muse Group employees, auditors, advisors, legal representatives and "similar agents," potential company buyers, and "any competent law enforcement body, regulatory, government agency, court or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary (i) as a matter of applicable law or regulation, or (ii) to exercise, establish or defend our legal rights." ![]() The data collected includes OS version and name, user country based on IP address, the CPU being used, data related to Audacity error codes and crash reports, and finally "Data necessary for law enforcement, litigation and authorities' requests (if any)." On April 30, the Muse Group acquired Audacity with the promise that the software would "remain forever free and open source." However, as FOSS Post reports, last week the Audacity privacy policy page was updated to add a number of personal data collection clauses. Original Story 7/5:Anyone deciding to download the free and open-source audio editor Audacity is being warned that the software may now class as spyware due to recent updates to its privacy policy.Īudacity is a popular audio editing software tool that's been around for over 21 years. Muse Group is expected to publish a revised version of the Audacity privacy policy in the coming days. I am holding out for a fork to gain momentum, and will stay on pre-MUSE Audacity until then." The top comment by TeachandMusic462 is a reflection of this, stating: "After the telemetry, CLA, and now this, do you expect any trust from the community? MUSE still does not understand open source software at a fundamental level. Responses to the post on GitHub suggest trust between Muse Group and the Audacity community has already broken down. Ray then spends time clarifiying each of the clauses in the new privacy policy that caused so much concern, and also points out that this version of the policy "doesn't actually come into force until the next release of Audacity (3.0.3)" so it doesn't apply to the current 3.0.2 version people are using.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |